Fact sheet: Aerobic composting

From: Public Services and Procurement Canada

On this page

Description

Aerobic composting is an ex situ remediation technology that can be carried out on or off-site, where microorganisms present in the soil are used to degrade contaminants and use them as an energy source. This technology operates under aerobic conditions and generates high temperatures (between 54 °C and 65 °C).

Aerobic composting consists in mixing contaminated soils with structuring agents (wood chips, hay and/or manure), organic amendments and/or plant residues. Specific microorganisms can also be added to stimulate the biodegradation of contaminants.

There are three main methods for aerobic composting:

  1. The static aerated pile (compost is placed in a pile and aeration is done using an air injection or extraction system, that is a biopile). Refer to the “Aerobic Biopile” fact sheet for more information on this technology.
  2. The mechanical reactor (the compost is placed in a reactor equipped with a mixing blade and an air injection system).
  3. Turned windrows (compost is placed in long, thin piles and turned periodically using machinery). Windrow-turned composting is considered the most economical method, but the method where the risk of volatilization of volatile contaminants is greatest.

Sources:

Implementation of the technology

The implementation of aerobic composting may include:

  • mobilization, access and preparation of the site and installation of temporary facilities;
  • excavation of contaminated soils, including the installation of retaining, pumping and/or slope stability control systems if required;
  • development of the aerobic composting system, if the technology is implemented on site, including the collection and treatment of vapour or liquid effluents and its operation or transportation by truck to an existing treatment site;
  • securing or backfilling the excavation;
  • leachate and runoff collection and treatment systems;
  • aeration and irrigation system;
  • the use of impermeable geomembrane cover for the protection of clean soil;
  • water sprayer and/or biodegradable soil covers for dust control;
  • mixing using specialized equipment, agricultural equipment or an excavator;
  • addition of fertilizers and/or additives.

Materials and Storage

On-site storage may include amendments, nutrients, fuel, lubricants, and other site materials required for treatment, operation of machinery, and equipment needed to implement the process.

Temporary piles of contaminated soil awaiting treatment or transport off-site may also be found on the site.

Sites with seepage water in excavation areas and/or runoff can store it in tanks if it is contaminated. They can also treat it on site, which requires storage of materials for the operation of the water treatment system.

Residues and Discharges

All contaminated soil is normally excavated. Therefore, there is minimal residue associated with this technology. The waste on site is typical of a construction site.

Dust may be emitted from excavations, soil treatment areas, or soil spread on the ground by equipment wheels or tracks. Vapour effluents may be emitted from the volatilization of contaminants from excavation walls or temporary piles and/or excavation water if dewatering is required. These effluents may need to be treated.

Natural biodegradation, particularly of hydrocarbons, can also produce vapour emissions of non-contaminant products. These products may include carbon dioxide, ammonia, methane and/or hydrogen sulphide.

Recommended analyses for detailed characterization

Biological analysis

  • Enumeration of the total heterotrophic bacterial population and the specific bacterial population.

Chemical analysis

  • pH
  • Organic matter content
  • Contaminant concentrations present in the following phases:
    • adsorbed
    • free
  • Nutrient concentrations including:
    • nitrates
    • nitrites
    • total phosphorus
    • organic nitrogen
    • potassium
    • sulfates

Physical analysis

  • Temperature
  • Soil water content
  • Soil granulometry

Recommended trials for detailed characterization

Biological trials

  • Conducting laboratory tests to verify the efficiency of biodegradation
  • Small-scale nutrient and/or amendment addition tests (on-site or off-site) to determine optimal dosages

Physical trials

  • Soil mixing tests (on-site or off-site) to determine recurrence, equipment and optimal parameters for optimal aerobic treatment.

Other information recommended for detailed characterization

Phase II

  • Regional climatic conditions (precipitation, temperature, etc.)
  • Presence of potential environmental receptors
  • Presence of above and below ground infrastructure
  • Characterization and delimitation of the extent of the contamination

Phase III

  • Volume of contaminated material to treat
  • Characterization of the hydrogeological system including:
    • the direction and speed of the groundwater flow
    • the hydraulic conductivity
    • the seasonal fluctuations
    • the hydraulic gradient
  • Hydraulic tests to evaluate dewatering flows, if necessary
  • Evaluation of discharge water quality (if pumping required)

Applications

The technology applies to organic compounds that can be degraded under aerobic conditions.

Applicable for the treatment of soils that have conditions favourable to biodegradation: the soil temperature should generally be between 54 °C and 65 °C, the pH between 6 and 8, and the humidity between 50% and 80%.

Applications to sites in northern regions

  • The technology is achievable in northern environments, however, remote sites require greater mobilization, resulting in higher on-site supervision costs. In addition, equipment availability is limited and work windows are relatively short.
  • The cold climate could have a negative impact on the biodegradation processes of the contaminants. The treatment time will be longer compared to that in a temperate climate. However, the potential for contaminant migration and volatilization will be reduced.
  • Difficulties in obtaining timely test results may necessitate reliance on field screening and incremental interventions.
  • Low temperatures slow down biodegradation significantly. Research suggests that insulating the pile and/or providing a low level of heating may be effective in some situations.
  • Compost piles are popular options in remote areas, but they must be designed to operate without operator intervention for long periods of time.

Treatment type

Treatment type
Treatment typeApplies or Does not apply
In situ
Does not apply
Ex situ
Applies
Biological
Applies
Chemical
Does not exist
Control
Does not exist
Dissolved contamination
Does not exist
Free Phase
Applies
Physical
Applies
Residual contamination
Applies
Resorption
Applies
Thermal
Does not exist

State of technology

State of technology
State of technologyExist or Does not exist
Testing
Does not exist
Commercialization
Exist

Target contaminants

Target contaminantsApplies, Does not apply or With restrictions
Aliphatic chlorinated hydrocarbons
With restrictions
Chlorobenzenes
With restrictions
Explosives
Applies
Metals
Does not apply
Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
With restrictions
Non metalic inorganic compounds
Does not apply
Pesticides
With restrictions
Petroleum hydrocarbons
Applies
Phenolic compounds
With restrictions
Policyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Applies
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Does not apply

Treatment time

Treatment time
Treatment timeApplies or Does not apply
Less than 1 year
Applies
1 to 3 years
Applies
3 to 5 years
Does not apply
More than 5 years
Does not apply

Notes:

Aerobic composting may require months or a few years to treat contaminated soils. Less volatile and more recalcitrant compounds may require up to two years of treatment. Easily degradable compounds can be treated in a few weeks.

Long-term considerations (following remediation work)

Contaminated soils are excavated and will only be reused on site if they meet the environmental and geotechnical criteria allowed for the site. In this sense, little to no long-term consideration exists at the treated sites following backfilling and when the equipment and facilities have been dismantled.

Secondary by-products and/or metabolites

Aerobic biodegradation of organic contaminants does not usually generate toxic by-products or metabolites. It generates products such as carbon dioxide and water. 

However, some recalcitrant compounds, such as explosives, can generate toxic metabolites during composting.

Limitations and Undesirable Effects of the Technology

  • Requires a large area for the construction of the treatment area and its infrastructure.
  • The conditions and the time of treatment depend on the climatic conditions.
  • The emission of dust or the volatilization of certain contaminants can be a problem.
  • Excavation costs can be high if it has to be done at great depth.
  • High concentrations of contaminants or low concentrations of nutrients can affect the effectiveness of the treatment.
  • May require control, collection and treatment of runoff and/or leachate. Significant treatment areas may require capping, paving, or conditioning (e.g., with lime treatment) of large areas, necessitating runoff management and local changes in soil water infiltration paths. 
  • High initial concentrations can be toxic to microorganisms.
  • Following treatment, the volume of treated soils may be greater than the original volume of contaminated soils due to the addition of structuring agents.
  • The transportation of contaminated soil for off-site treatment may not be well received by the population.
  • Variations in redox potential, pH, ionic strength, and/or soil organic matter content can affect the mobilization of metals such as cadmium, copper, zinc, or chromium.
  • The application of an external heat source and/or high frequencies of carbon use can result in high temperatures. However, fires are rare.
  • Increased desorption or volatilization is possible (and is sometimes even a design feature).
  • The presence of heavy machinery used for the work can cause temporary nuisances for the population. The concerns of the neighbourhood and stakeholders are often related to dust, noise, odours, light (at night) and traffic problems.

Complementary technologies that improve treatment effectiveness

Complementary technologies can be combined with aerobic composting to improve its efficiency. These technologies include:

  • Biostimulation (addition of nutrients, oxygen, carbon);
  • Bioaugmentation (addition of microorganisms);
  • Air injection and/or irrigation system to maintain humidity;
  • A physical operation such as sieving to reduce the aggregates before processing;

The addition of hot air to increase the soil temperature (54 °C to 65 °C) to stimulate bacterial growth and biodegradation.

Required secondary treatments

  • Collection and treatment of off-gases, if required;
  • Collection and treatment of runoff and/or leachate, if required.

Application examples

The following links provide application examples:

Performance

The turned windrow method (compost is placed in long piles and turned periodically using machinery) appears to be the most cost-effective type of aerobic composting. A high level of treatment, 99% or more reduction in contaminant levels, has been observed in the past.

Measures to improve sustainability or promote ecological remediation

  • Use of renewable energy and energy-efficient equipment for technology implementation.
  • Optimization of the schedule to promote resource sharing and reduce the number of mobilization days.
  • Recycling of leachate to promote the addition of nutrients to the soil.
  • Collection of rainwater for the purpose of irrigation.
  • The use of dewatering water in the aerobic soil composting process to reduce water requirements and discharge.
  • Passive ventilation techniques to provide oxygen to soil piles.
  • The use of the TRIAD approach for the planning and execution of site characterization steps in order to optimize characterization efforts and reduce the ecological footprint of this work.
  • Use of locally produced fertilizers or amendments.
  • Valorization of treated soils.

References

Author and update

Composed by : Magalie Turgeon, National Research Council

Updated by : Jennifer Holdner, M.Sc., Public Works Government Services Canada

Updated Date : March 1, 2015

Latest update provided by : Nathalie Arel ing., M.Sc., Frédéric Gagnon CPI., Sylvain Hains ing., M.Sc., Golder Associates Ltd.

Updated Date : March 30, 2022

Version:
1.2.5